There is now a crowded market of agencies selling some version of getting your B2B SaaS product named when a buyer asks an AI assistant. They use different words for it, AEO, GEO, AI visibility, AI search, and they are not interchangeable offers. The hard part of choosing between them is that most of the useful information is behind a call.
How this list was built
Ten agencies, each selling to B2B SaaS, each read from its own published pages on one day. Nothing here comes from a directory, a review site or another agency's roundup. Where a fact is absent the table says so, because an absence is a finding when the question is what a firm is willing to put in writing.
One kind of company is deliberately absent. Software products that measure AI visibility are not in this list, because setting a tool licence beside an agency retainer is not a like for like comparison and the columns below would mean different things in each row. This page is about firms you hire to do the work. Anything we could not read on an agency's own site is recorded as not published rather than guessed at.
Who each one suits
| Agency | What it sells | Engagement shape |
|---|---|---|
| Salienz (us) | AI visibility for B2B SaaS, sold as separate disciplines | Fixed-scope audit, then a 90-day retainer |
| Discovered Labs | AEO only, B2B SaaS only, founded 2024 | Retainer around a six-step CITABLE framework |
| Scalerrs | SaaS-only SEO and AEO, heavy on Reddit placement | Retainer |
| Passionfruit | SEO, GEO and AEO across three verticals, one of them B2B SaaS | Retainer, run on its own platform |
| Optimist (YesOptimist) | B2B SaaS SEO and AEO, Series A through IPO | One-off roadmap, advisory, or full service |
| Grizzle | Organic programme spanning content, digital PR and video | Retainer or campaign sprints |
| Animalz | Content-led growth for established SaaS brands | Retainer |
| First Page Sage | SEO and GEO for enterprise B2B | No long-term contract |
| Directive | Full B2B marketing, not an AI visibility specialist | Partnership, contact for terms |
| DerivateX | AI visibility, with a stated $5M ARR floor | Tiered retainer, placement budget billed separately |
Two of these are not really competing for the same brief. Animalz and Directive are a content agency and a full-service B2B marketing agency respectively, both of which now sell an AI visibility line alongside everything else. If the problem you are solving is narrow, a specialist is a different purchase from a generalist who has added the service. Neither is worse. They are answers to different questions.
What each one publishes
One column that looked promising was dropped before publication. Naming the answer engines separates nobody: Discovered Labs, Optimist, Passionfruit, Scalerrs, Grizzle and Directive all list ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews somewhere in their copy, and so do we. Listing the engines is table stakes rather than a differentiator, and a column where nine rows say the same thing is decoration.
| Agency | Rate on its own site | One client per category |
|---|---|---|
| Discovered Labs | EUR 4,370 diagnostic, then 6,995 to 15,995 a month on a six-month term | Not published |
| Optimist | $7,500 roadmap, then from $3,000 or $4,000 a month | Not published |
| Salienz (us) | $800 audit, then $3,499 or $5,499 a month | Yes, product sub-niche |
| DerivateX | $3,500 diagnostic, then $5,000 to $12,000 a month | Not published |
| Passionfruit | Not published, quoted after an exploratory call | Not published |
| Animalz | Not published | Not published |
| Grizzle | No rate card, states sprints start at $10,000 | Not published |
| Scalerrs | Not published | Not published |
| First Page Sage | Not published, though it publishes pricing surveys | Not published |
| Directive | Not published | Not published |
A framework is not a method
Almost every agency here publishes a named framework. Discovered Labs has CITABLE, Optimist has the CORE Framework, Directive has DiscoverabilityOS, Grizzle has four pillars. These are useful for understanding how a firm thinks and they are not methods.
A method answers different questions. How many prompts do you run. How many times each, given that the same question returns different answers on different days. What do you compare the result against. What happens to a run that finds nothing. Naming the engines is easy and everybody does it. Those other numbers are the ones that decide whether a report means anything, and they are the ones almost nobody puts on a page.
The question most of these pages do not answer
Whether a direct competitor of yours can be a client at the same time is the difference between an agency working for you and an agency working in your category. It is a contract question rather than a marketing one, and it is published by very few firms in this set.
A capacity cap is not the same thing and is often mistaken for it. An agency saying it works with ten clients at a time has limited its workload, not its conflicts, and two of those ten can be direct rivals. We looked at this specifically across a different group of eight agencies and wrote it up separately, including where the distinction is drawn and what to ask before signing. Only one of the ten on this page publishes such a rule, which is us, and that is a fact about this particular set rather than about the market.
Where these agencies beat us
A comparison published by an entrant is worth nothing if every column happens to favour the publisher. Several here do things we do not.
- Animalz has an enterprise client list, naming Atlassian, Airtable, Amplitude and Auth0 among others, that we cannot match. If the buying committee needs recognisable logos on the pitch, that is a real advantage. 7
- First Page Sage states that it does not lock clients into long-term contracts. Our retainers run on 90-day terms, so anybody wanting to leave inside a month should prefer them. 8
- Grizzle sells video and YouTube alongside written content. YouTube is a genuine citation surface and we do not produce video. 6
- Directive covers paid media, lifecycle and PR in one place. If you want one agency for the whole funnel rather than a specialist for one part, a specialist is the wrong purchase. 9
- Optimist publishes a lower monthly entry point than we do, at $3,000 a month for an advisory engagement where the client executes. If budget is the binding constraint, that matters. 5
- Passionfruit runs engagements on its own platform. Where that platform is the deliverable a client wants, buying it from the firm that built it is reasonable. 4
Where we concentrate
B2B SaaS is the scope. Within it we take one client per product sub-niche, which means the categories we are currently working in are closed and the ones we are not are open. The list below is where we are concentrating rather than a limit on what we will look at.
- Compliance automation, meaning SOC 2, ISO 27001 and GDPR tooling.
- SaaS security posture management, which is new enough that the citation field is close to empty.
- Identity and access management for the mid-market, where the enterprise answers are already settled and the tier below is not.
- API security, where the comparison content is thin and the buyers are heavy users of ChatGPT and Perplexity.
- Vulnerability management for the mid-market, where the enterprise names dominate and everything under them is invisible.
- Beyond security: legal tech including contract lifecycle management, finance and regulatory compliance, mid-market applicant tracking, and accounting and finance operations.
If your category is not on that list, it is more likely to be open than closed. If it is on the list, ask us which sub-niches are already occupied before you spend time on a call.
How to use this list
- 01Decide first whether you want a specialist or a generalist who has added the service. That eliminates most of the list either way.
- 02Ask every shortlisted agency for the method rather than the framework: prompt count, named engines, runs per prompt, and what the result is compared against.
- 03Ask what happens to a run that finds nothing, and whether you will see it.
- 04Name your two closest competitors and ask directly whether either could become a client. A capacity cap is not an answer to that question.
- 05Get the rate before the call where you can. Three of the ten here let you.
Receipts
14 sources- 01Salienz pricing and audit methodOur own published pages. The $800 fixed-scope audit and the $3,499 and $5,499 monthly tiers, and the free audit specification of 15 prompts run three ways across five named engines for 195 answers, with the note that two engines always search the web and so sit out one run.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 02Discovered Labs pricingRead in the browser rather than through a summariser. Retainers are month to month with no long-term commitment, and the headline figures of 6,995 for Establish and 10,995 for Compete are the six-month committed rates, stated on the page as 1,000 and 2,000 euros a month less than month to month. Outlier starts at 15,995. A 4,370 euro Search Visibility Diagnostic is credited in full against the first retainer month if a retainer is signed within fourteen days of the findings walkthrough. Google, Bing, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews are named. Pods run from four people to seven. No category exclusivity statement appears.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 03Optimist AEO and GEO service pageChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and AI Overviews named as the surfaces the work targets, and a contact form offering budget bands of $5,000 to $9,000, $10,000 to $20,000 and above $20,000. No prompt count, run count or measurement baseline is stated.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 04Directive SEO service pageChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews named on the service page, with no pricing figures anywhere on it. Recorded because it is the evidence that naming the engines does not separate these agencies from one another.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 05ScalerrsPositioning as a SaaS-only SEO and AEO agency selling content, backlinks and Reddit placement, with citation in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and Gemini named as the outcome. No rate card appeared in the pages read.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 06PassionfruitPositioning as a venture-backed, AI-native SEO, GEO and AEO agency working across three verticals, one of which is B2B SaaS, with engagements run on its own Passionfruit Labs platform. No rate card appeared in the pages read.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 07Optimist pricingPublished pricing of a $7,500 one-off roadmap, advisory from $3,000 per month where the client executes, and full service from $4,000 per month, alongside a free organic revenue opportunity analysis and the CORE Framework.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 08GrizzlePositioning as a multi-channel organic growth agency for B2B SaaS covering content, SEO, digital PR and video, with AI Search and GEO named as core deliverables and AI Overview citations tracked as a success metric. Retainers and campaign sprints mentioned without rates.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 09AnimalzPositioning as content marketing and SEO for leading B2B SaaS brands, with answer engine optimisation named among the services and a client list including WorkOS, Airtable, Amplitude, Atlassian and Auth0. No pricing appeared in the pages read.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 10First Page SagePositioning as an SEO and GEO agency for B2B, with enterprise clients including Salesforce, Logitech, Verizon and US Bank named, and the stated position that it does not lock clients into long-term contracts. No pricing appeared in the pages read.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 11DirectivePositioning as a full B2B marketing agency across performance, commerce and communications, serving technology, industrial and services verticals, with the DiscoverabilityOS framework named. No pricing appeared in the pages read.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 12DerivateX pricingRe-read on 4 September 2026 and repriced since the August reading carried by the companion pricing post. Three flat retainers of $5,000, $8,000 and $12,000 per month plus an individually scoped enterprise tier, a $3,500 one-time diagnostic, off-site citation budget stated as separate from the retainer at $1,000 to $1,200, $1,500 to $2,000 and $2,000 to $3,000 by tier, 90-day pilots on the lower two with no lock-in after, a six-month minimum on the top tier, and a stated floor of B2B SaaS from $5M ARR. No statement about category exclusivity appears.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 13Grizzle published figuresNo rate card. Editorial on its own site states that fixed-scope campaigns such as Grizzle's Digital PR Sprints can start from $10,000, alongside industry ranges for digital PR retainers and content that are not its own prices. No statement about category exclusivity or capacity appears.Last checked 4 September 2026
- 14Scalerrs, checked for rates and exclusivityNo service pricing appears on its SaaS SEO service page. Cost comparisons to hiring in house and to tooling are given, which are not Scalerrs rates. No statement about exclusivity, capacity or competitor conflicts appears. 80+ SaaS teams is claimed.Last checked 4 September 2026

