Loading
Compliance and risk leads at banks, fintechs and payment firms ask AI assistants which tools handle monitoring, screening and regulatory reporting. We work on what those answers say about your product, and whether they name it at all.
Updated
“Which transaction monitoring tool suits a fintech processing card payments in the UK and EU, with a two-person compliance team?”
“For a small team, Vendor A and Vendor B combine rules and machine learning with a quick setup. Vendor C covers more regions but needs more tuning…”
Placeholders, not real vendors or results.
Buyers type a few words into a search box. In an AI assistant they describe their situation: the regulators they answer to, the countries they operate in, the size of the team, the systems their data lives in. Each detail narrows the shortlist, and each one is a fact the answer has to get right about you.
In a search box
In an AI assistant
Example questions, written to show the shape. Vendor names are placeholders.
The paid audit and every monthly check record how each engine describes you, not only whether it names you. In regulatory technology, these are the details buyers filter on.
AML and sanctions regimes, reporting frameworks and the countries you operate in. Buyers ask for their own regulators, and an answer that leaves one of yours out drops you from that question.
Monitoring, screening, KYC and KYB, case management or reporting. These categories overlap, and the answer should file you under the ones you actually serve.
Audit trails and the reasons behind an alert or a figure. Buyers ask whether an examiner will accept your output.
API or platform, cloud regions and where data is held. Where data is held can rule a tool out on its own.
A fintech with a compliance team of two wants an API and quick tuning; a bank with hundreds wants case management and model governance. The answer should say which of them you serve.
Engines that search the web show their sources. For your own questions, the baseline records which of these each engine used, so the work goes where your answers come from.
Head of compliance, MLRO
“Which AML and sanctions tools suit a fintech with a two-person compliance team?”
Which checks you run, in which regions, and how you explain an alert.
Read the financial compliance page
Regulatory reporting lead, CFO
“How do we automate returns to more than one regulator without a big IT project?”
Which regimes you cover, and how a return is checked before it is filed.
Read the regulatory reporting page
Example questions are illustrative.
The same four steps run on every retainer. The plan you pick sets how many questions we track and how much work ships each term.
We build the questions compliance and risk leads ask, with you: 100 or 150 depending on the plan, mostly unbranded, grouped into clusters by regime, region and stage. You approve them before anything runs.
Every question runs on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot and Google (AI Overviews, AI Mode and Gemini). We record who gets named, how each engine describes the rules and regions you cover, and which pages it cites.
A written estimate of what the scope can move by day 90, as ranges per cluster and engine. The scope is locked with it.
Comparison and alternatives pages, revamps of regulation and product pages you already have, corrected review profiles, placements on the pages engines cite, and community work. Each month end is measured against the forecast.
If we work with an AML screening vendor, we don't take its direct competitor, so we are never chasing the same citations for two of you.
Nobody controls what the engines say. You get a measured baseline, a written forecast and a monthly check that shows a flat month as flat.
Compliance buyers check every claim, and nothing about a regulation ships unless your own experts have signed it off. We interview your product lead at the start, then for 30 minutes a month, and you approve every brief.
It is how often, and how accurately, AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot and Google's AI features name your product when compliance and risk leads ask which tools handle monitoring, screening or reporting. It covers being on the shortlist and being described correctly: which rules and regions you cover, what you do, how you explain decisions and where data is held.
Send your website, your category in a sentence and up to five competitors. If we think the free audit will tell you something, it arrives 48 business hours after we confirm.